Updated 10/30/96...

Ready for some sax music?

Before you do something other than vote for Dole, please consider the following thoughts:


Please Do Not "Rock the Vote"!

There's no reason to spend another Thanksgiving with the REAL TURKEY staying in the White House for another term!

Please read between the lines a little bit. Everything you hear is biased, including the content on this very page. Even if there were some magical goodwill on the part of the TV anchors to set aside their large egos in an interest of "being fair", there would still be an unintentional bias.

A bias is inevitable. It is not in of itself necessarily bad. In the old days such a bias was known as having a position. If however the pretend game of impartiality is applied to something that cannot be impartial, that is when there is the maximum potential for deception.

Not sure that there is a bias?

During a Presidential Election, each candidate is allowed only so much spending on advertising their platform. Clinton and Dole will have roughly the same level of representation by PAID advertisements. The free advertisement from the free press has no maximum budget. The free advertising from the Hollywood elite has no maximum budget.

Consider the following examples:

Prior to Bills being President, the only examples of films about the White House were the Clear and Present Danger variety where crazed madmen Darth Vader types ran an evil empire of murder and massacre for their own personal interests--I suppose there's no need to discuss the epidemic of actual murder and massacre (whoops, I'm sorry--suicides) during Clinton's watch.

Perhaps I missed a few films that weren't made for Democrat specials. Please send me email before I run out and vote for the wrong candidate!

"Issues Not Insults"... a new rule invented by Clinton's best campaign helpers--the mainstream "news" makers

Think about this. Clinton is ripe for insults. His character is not questionable--it is undeniable. When it comes to a Presidential Election, both the reason to choose one and the reasons to avoid another apply.

The burden of sifting through that which is important and not falls upon the voting public, not the candidates!

Sure Clinton might be snortin' cocain and smokin' dope. He might be personally responsible for some of the magical mysterious deaths in high places. Does his loathsome character outweigh all the fine things he offers in carrying out his leftist ideology? That determination must be made by the public and politicians are big boys and should be expected to be questioned on there character.

Oh by the way... character DOES matter when it comes to leadership. Of course so far as the Democrats are concerned it only matters when it comes to Clarence Thomas, or former Senator Packwood.

Be assured that the character flaws of Bill's and the misfit Hillary by far outweigh the sum total of Clarence Thomas, Packwood, and Barbara Boxer combined!

What about Rush Limbaugh's Success?

The fact that the media has been terribly leftward biased is EXACTLY WHY Rush has become the great success!

Rush is like the McDonald's in Moscow! He's serving up average cuisine to a crowd that's been eatin' like peasants. Although a relatively gifted entertainer, Rush doesn't have to be a genius to grab a lion share of an audience that has been force fed oatmeal and grits prior to his first moment in the limelight.


Back